The liberal as doorkeepers

Violence and power always comes along with the morals. It never negotiates but forces. To maintain the rules for inequality, the weak are forced to do "their own work" only - following the usual lifecourse, labor at lowest price, saving when interest is low, giving birth to baby, studying, or yielding any rights to more deserved - so that their resposibilities outnumbers rights or freedom. Then they become too busy/too tired to care the bigger things or already forgot. This happens only when the rules can't be persuaded contextually or logically, or the rules were not for those on the first place.

So, there are some-or many- people who chose to be a moralist in this world. Even though their SES(social economic status) is not good enough, keeping the moral of the era makes their meaning of the life. They volunteer as the doorkeeper who never goes in but gets small tips for keeping the less outside. So they say, for (usually, the other's) economic freedom you should be responsible (for all those good things resulting only in negative externality to your own economic status), While their "moral practice" mostly consists of praising the good rich and repeating to the weakests of their responsibilities as they were told.It is called the LIBERALISM. What an irony!