Shame

I think some pple are going to work harder, ashamed at their inactiveness. ^^

You don't need to be offensive inappropriately.

Well, You may want to deny that you are in one ship with who you hates so much that you want to eliminate them, or say that they are in no need. but in the first place, what made you with them? you told that you can give them worthy if they vote you, or they have same desire with you to go to the same goal. but what? they are not enough? their thoughts are bad for progress? or what, you just don't wanna see them while you still benefit from their support?

anything haven't changed from the Koryo or Chosun era. men are always erase the existence of women who works for, pays for their work disguised as 'everyone's goal'. fuck you.

nonsense

As a flawed person, I always think thorough when someone claims of fault while offending me with not related matters, if I am really a bitch. but it is not - who does things should not done is them at the point, which also messes the situation which could be easily solved otherwise. I am so sorry for those 'bitches'' life which can't be legetimized unless claiming others' guilty.

long term work

if you can't get waht you want in speed of instant, don't give it up or be depressed.

it will become the Artwork of two days, or a week, or a month.

Existence

sometimes there are some things which exists before asking why.

The liberal as doorkeepers

Violence and power always comes along with the morals. It never negotiates but forces. To maintain the rules for inequality, the weak are forced to do "their own work" only - following the usual lifecourse, labor at lowest price, saving when interest is low, giving birth to baby, studying, or yielding any rights to more deserved - so that their resposibilities outnumbers rights or freedom. Then they become too busy/too tired to care the bigger things or already forgot. This happens only when the rules can't be persuaded contextually or logically, or the rules were not for those on the first place.

So, there are some-or many- people who chose to be a moralist in this world. Even though their SES(social economic status) is not good enough, keeping the moral of the era makes their meaning of the life. They volunteer as the doorkeeper who never goes in but gets small tips for keeping the less outside. So they say, for (usually, the other's) economic freedom you should be responsible (for all those good things resulting only in negative externality to your own economic status), While their "moral practice" mostly consists of praising the good rich and repeating to the weakests of their responsibilities as they were told.It is called the LIBERALISM. What an irony!

There is nothing special in discriminating.

if you say only the father's enjoyment, it is discriminating by emphasizing men's feeling. If you say the girl is not objectively pretty, you are discriminating people because you are always mentioning the objective standard to be a pretty women worth displayed in your sight, not for men.

If you say "I am just talking" it is discrimination for our ears to hear it other than enjoy the silent if your discriminating, words empowering already having the power was not told.

what is expected to minorities?

Whenever I meet those people who think that I am different from others, or somewhat awkward, They become protective that their beliefs or way of thoughts should be conquered by me. "Do what you wanna do and don't intrude" is ordinary response. They, some ordinary(?) people seems don't want to change. but are they really not changing or moving? no. "Almost all of us will agree ~~" arguments secretly persuades the majority, ordinary people and it changes the thoughts.

The transition always starts with those "typical" things, and who defines the ordinary and typical is the power.

So, there are some issues related with this.
1) ordinary word overused to persuade people(esp. Toward conservative, discriminating the minorities side) has to be detected.

2) ousting the minorities from the agora(public) speech has to be forbidden, because it structurally empowering the speech of the power.

3) why we should be "majority", or is it true? that despite all those differences we are all the same wanting to eat to have sex and say pretty only to "certified-all-those-beauty-standards"? What makes us not to be just ourselves thinking on our own brains?